[2015] EWHC 2839 (Fam)

14 October 2015

Judge: Stephen Cobb

Preceded by:

[2011] EWHC 3431 (Fam)

20 December 2011

Judge: Mark Hedley

[2013] EWHC 2305 (Fam)

31 July 2013

Judge: Stephen Cobb

Counsel for the fathers: Robin Tolson

[2013] EWHC 4150 (Fam)

20 December 2013

Judge: Stephen Cobb

[2014] EWHC 818 (Fam)

20 March 2014

Judge: Stephen Cobb

The case involved Mark Berelowitz, Hamish Cameron and Karen Woodall.

[2015] EWCA Civ 274

27 January 2015

Judges: Andrew McFarlane, Patrick Elias, Richard McCombe

Reported in Family Law Week.

In ‘Greater than the mere sum of its parts’: coercive control and the question of proof, Adrienne Barnett of Brunel University criticizes Andrew McFarlane for failing to understand the cumulative, long term effects of coercive control and insisting instead on specific, serious incidents of violence.

[2015] EWCA Civ 115

18 February 2015

Judges: Jill Black, Eleanor King, David Keene

Barrister for the children’s guardian: Jessica Lee

[2015] IECA 29

23 February 2015

Judges: Kelly, Irvine, Hogan

Expert: Jim Sheehan

[2015] EWFC B188

Judge: Miranda Robertshaw

Expert: Mark Berelowitz

An “alienated” mother was refused permission to instruct “‘parental alienation expert’, KW” (Karen Woodall).

 Re P and Q (Children: Care Proceedings: Fact Finding) [2015] EWFC 26 (Fam)

19 March 2015

Judge: Anna Pauffley

Barrister: June Venters

The mother, Ella Draper, and her new partner, Abraham Christie, accused the father of ritual satanic sexual abuse of the children and of sexual abuse and murder of other children. Sabine McNeill acted as Draper’s McKenzie Friend. The allegations were entirely fabricated, and the fathers’ rights movement was jubilant. The case was widely reported, including in the Daily Mail.

Family Law Week

Regina v McNeill [2019] EWCA Crim 1566

Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax, Channel 4, 11 March 2024

[2015] EWCA Civ 389

22 April 2015

Family Law Week

[2015] EWFC B188

Judge: Miranda Robertshaw

Expert: Mark Berelowitz

Mother insisted on having parental alienation expert “KW” [Karen Woodall] from the Family Separation Clinic instructed, but the judge refused permission.

[2015] EWFC 40

Judge: Clifford Bellamy

Judge ordered boy to be placed in foster care due to parental conflict and damaging immersion into the mother’s Jehovah’s Witness faith.

Expert: Paul Livock

Rebecca Minnock v Roger Williams

Judge: Stephen Wildblood

Expert: Mark Berelowitz

VS13 P00027 8 June 2015

Links to all the Minnock judgements

C (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 539

10 June 2015

Earlier judge: Richard Scarratt

Appeal judges: Richard Aikens, Patrick Elias, Ernest Ryder

Family Law Hub: “Appeal by father in private law proceedings, against order requiring he be subject to a psychological report and pay half the costs. Appeal allowed because, broadly, the court and judge on appeal had ignored the current Rules on experts that came into force in 2013.”

17 June 2015

[2015] EWCA Civ 910

Judges: Andrew McFarlane, Stephen Richards, Christopher Clarke

Withers Worldwide, Parental alienation: surely the time has come to effect change? 19 May 2016

[2015] EWHC 2090

15 July 2015

Stuart Graham, acting as the “alienated” father’s McKenzie friend, sought the imprisonment of two Cafcass officers and the mother’s solicitors for their perceived failings after the father was granted only indirect contact with his daughter. Mrs Justice Roberts concluded that “Given the clear objectives which lay at the heart of these applications, as those objectives were articulated to me by Mr Graham, I consider the applications constituted an abuse of the court process.”

[2015] EWCA Civ 829

28 July 2015

Judges: Patrick Elias and Eleanor King

[2015] EWCA Civ 1041

15 September 2015

Judges: Jill Black, previously Jane Evans-Gordon

Transfer of residence

[2015] EW Misc B36

14 August 2015

Judge: Damien Lochrane - openly gay

Daily Telegraph: Christian ruled too sexist to care for his daughter

“A Father who went to court in an attempt to force his 16-year-old daughter to leave her mother to live with him so that he could instil in her his traditional Christian values has had his case rejected by a judge who suggested he was a sexist throwback to another age. 

Judge Damien Lochrane said the man, who cannot be identified, had demonstrated an “antediluvian attitude towards women” and appeared to believe they were incapable of making “sensible” decisions on their own. 

The father also demonstrated an “arrogant” disregard for the teenager’s own wishes after she made it clear she did not want to live with him. 

It was, the judge said, “difficult to imagine” how the man, from Cheshire, functioned in 21st-century Britain “while harbouring such attitudes”.

The judge detailed how the father, a successful professional, wanted the girl to move hundreds of miles away from her mother. 

He wanted to take over responsibility for her education, teach her about her paternal heritage and promised he would “ensure that she goes to church”. The judge said the mother and father were never involved in a “proper relationship and that the father had never played a part in his daughter’s care”. 

Judge Lochrane said the girl did not share her father’s traditional Christian beliefs and was adamant that she wanted to stay with her mother. 

But the father was, the judge said, convinced the girl’s mother was poisoning her mind against him. 

She had written her father an “anguished” letter, explaining her feelings on the issue but the father “could not even bring himself to consider it on any remotely sensitive level”. 

Instead, he “arrogantly dismissed it” as the handiwork of the girl’s mother, the judge said. 

Judge Lochrane said the father was “quite incapable of meeting this child’s needs” and remarked that bringing the case had been clearly against the teenager’s best interests. “He has demonstrated by his approach and his answers that he has what can most charitably be described as an antediluvian attitude towards women, their role in a properly ordered household and their ability to make sensible decisions of any importance for themselves,” he said. 

“It is difficult to imagine how he has sustained an apparently thriving [professional] practice in 21st-century Britain while harbouring such attitudes.” 

He added: “He has shown himself at best obdurate in his refusal to accept the blindingly obvious. 

“At worst he has sacrificed a good portion of the relationship he might otherwise have had with his daughter on the altar of his vain and arrogant refusal to afford due respect to the divergent views of his female child.” 

If the court ordered the girl to move in with a father she considered “emotionally distant”, the teenager would in all probability refuse to do so, he remarked. “The emotional trauma which this child would suffer by taking such a course should, in my judgment, be absolutely plain to even the most emotionally myopic.” 

The judge dismissed the father’s application.”

Premier Christian News

[2015] EWCA Civ 991

29 September 2015

Judges: James Munby, Nicholas Underhill, Robert Hildyard

[2015] EWHC 3300 (Fam)

16 November 2015

Hague Convention dispute involving parental alienation allegations by both sides, proven domestic violence, Bulgaria.

Judge: Stephen Cobb

F (Children) [2015] EWCA Civ 1315

26 November 2015

Family Law Week

Alienated mother

[2015] EWFC B235

26 November 2015

Judge: Simon Wood