Family Court judgements 2025
E (Children: Costs) [2025] EWCA Civ 183
27 February 2025
Partial costs awarded to the father against the mother.
T and G (Allegations of Alienating Behaviours), Re [2025] EWFC 15
Cross allegations of parental alienation
Ms V -v- Mr V and Amy V [2025] EWHC 945 (Fam)
16 April 2025
Mr Justice Peel
Mum fighting judge’s decision to let her child stay overnight with rapist dad, Sam Corbishley, Metro, 10 April 2025
Mum wins court appeal to stop daughter having to stay overnight with rapist dad, Sarah Hooper, Metro, 19 April 2025
A v B & Anor [2025] EWFC 179 (B)
09 May 2025
Her Honour Judge Stephanie Cope
16 May 2025
Her Honour Judge Shelley Hesford
Expert: Clinical psychologist, Jaime Craig
3 January 2025
JE v TS (No.2: Welfare Determinations) [2025] EWFC 198 (B)
24 June 2025
Judge: His Honour Adem Muzaffer
16 July 2025
Judge: Dexter Dias KC
The judge allowed the father’s appeal against Judge Sapnara’s earlier refusal to award costs. He ordered the mother to pay £37,000 costs to the father.
Follows from C v S [2022] EWHC 800 (Fam) in which Judge Sapnara ordered a transfer of residence from the mother to the father on the advice of psychologist Dr Hessel Willemsen.
30 July 2025
Mrs Frances Judd
Justin Ageros for the mother
Expert: Melanie Gill
The Father v The Mother & Ors [2025] EWHC 2135 (Fam)
30 July 2025
Judge: Mrs Justice Nathalie Lieven
The judge made a barring order against the father until the children’s 18th birthdays and a costs order of £5,900 in view of his use of “litigation as a method of coercive control”.
14 October 2025
Mr Justice Trowell
“The children became more resistant to seeing their father. Various professionals became involved: a family therapist, an independent social worker, and a psychologist.”
Mother v Father [2025] EWFC 420 (B)
5 November 2025
His Honour Judge Pates
The judge rejected the mother’s allegation that the father had sexually abused the son, while also rejecting the father’s allegation that the mother had used alienating behaviours. He found that the boy had aligned with his mother for understandable reasons because of the ongoing conflict between the parents. the father’s application for a shared live with order. He made an order for the child to live with the mother and have contact with the father. The local authority was ordered to give family assistance for twelve months. The judge issued a two year barring order to prevent either parent from making further applications and warned that the local authority may have to bring public law proceeding on the grounds of emotional harm if the parental conflict continued.
